Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Glenn McLaren's avatar

As a philosopher who has studied complex processes for over 25 years, this postmodern use of it to justify anarchy pisses me right off. I agree with Artep that this is a veiled attempt to justify the authors support for Trump as a change agent. As such, it is not enlightened dialectical thinking but an act of deception. Understanding complex processes requires understanding the nature of order. Edge of chaos or metastable conditions are not anarchic. They involve commitments with an openness to questioning those commitments and not a skeptical suspension of judgement to create a vacuum. Here is a philosopher effectively parroting speaker Mike Johnson when he said that it doesn't matter that Matt Gaetz had sex with under age girls as long as he can shake up the status quo and generate some excitement. A thriving rainforest does not need this kind of excitement to generate stability, particularly at the highest constraining levels. At the highest levels it needs relative stability and predictability to generate conditions for life at lower, smaller and faster levels. To suggest that someone like Trump could possibly be a facilitative constraint in this way is to be ignorant of this reality. Similar to the postmodernists, there is also a disturbing lack of feeling here for how much pain would be inflicted in a sudden destruction of the status quo, mainly for those least able to protect themselves. It's one of those famous philosopher's thought experiments (or wet dreams) abstracted from reality. Aristotle said that the mean of the extremes is the extreme of what is right and I, for one, as a teacher of process, regenerative ethics, cannot see a scenario where electing Trump as President is right and I'm happy to commit to that.

Expand full comment
Markael Luterra's avatar

Many thanks for posting the transcript - I don't usually watch videos.

I agree with you.

I do not at all resonate with Trump as a person - he is in many ways the epitome of the separate, insecure, narcissistic, entitled masculine that has been so out of balance - and yet he has the ability to take on established power structures, and this time around he seems to be expanding that with his appointments of Gabbard and RFK and others.

The bullet-grazing-the-ear is far too eerie to be purely coincidence. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred he would either be dead, seriously injured, or completely untouched. That was a clue to me that there is a larger story unfolding here, a larger pattern weaving in which Trump apparently has a starring role to play. But I don't think that role is going to be to "Make America Great Again" or to bring about what his followers expect.

There is an uncertainty to these times, but also - as you say - an anticipation. It feels like the ride is just beginning, but that the ultimate outcome - whatever it is - will be positive and transformational.

Expand full comment
81 more comments...

No posts