Do you mean that phony Jean Carrol case? That was outrageous and an excellent example of how the Dems have politicized the courts. That case was well past the statute of limitations and Dems in NY decided to pass a new law (specifically aimed at getting Trump) to allow old cases to be prosecuted. This one is so old, it is ridiculous to h…
Do you mean that phony Jean Carrol case? That was outrageous and an excellent example of how the Dems have politicized the courts. That case was well past the statute of limitations and Dems in NY decided to pass a new law (specifically aimed at getting Trump) to allow old cases to be prosecuted. This one is so old, it is ridiculous to have any sense of justice being served. It was simply he said, she said. The jurors were duped. I am outraged that the justice system has been abused in this way.
Can you explain why you are a better judge of that case than the jury of twelve who heard and saw all the evidence? What is the basis for believing you have special insight?
Do you mean that phony Jean Carrol case? That was outrageous and an excellent example of how the Dems have politicized the courts. That case was well past the statute of limitations and Dems in NY decided to pass a new law (specifically aimed at getting Trump) to allow old cases to be prosecuted. This one is so old, it is ridiculous to have any sense of justice being served. It was simply he said, she said. The jurors were duped. I am outraged that the justice system has been abused in this way.
Can you explain why you are a better judge of that case than the jury of twelve who heard and saw all the evidence? What is the basis for believing you have special insight?