Thank you. I appreciate it and just would like to be clear about what specifically are you referring to. I wrote several comments and replies so which comment are you referring to (you wrote "your first post above", you mean the one with the question for Charles?) and what SPECIFICALLY in the comment are you referring to? So that I may better umderstand what you are saying. Thank you
Thank you. I appreciate it and just would like to be clear about what specifically are you referring to. I wrote several comments and replies so which comment are you referring to (you wrote "your first post above", you mean the one with the question for Charles?) and what SPECIFICALLY in the comment are you referring to? So that I may better umderstand what you are saying. Thank you
My guess, based on what I've been reading here ... With "your first post above", Josh is referring to your comment to Leonara ... which starts with, "Leonara, two things. First regarding the content and second regarding the energy of your reply ...". I would guess Jowzer is also referring to that. It was rather long, at ~1600 words it basically a short essay. It was, from my point of view, also very inflammatory, and contained a significant amount of projection, evident (to me) in exactly what Josh has pointed out (e.g. "You are blaming another commentator for being "immature", "mocking", and "attacking", yet I don't think that you realize that you are doing much of the same yourself".)
It seems apparent to me you feel very strongly about the topic(s) at hand, and your behaviour comes across as highly reactionary and aggressive. I get the sense that underneath it all, you don't wish to come across as either of those things. But I don't wish to make assumptions about you.
Thank you. I understand what you are saying and will indeed take it to heart. Thank you for taking the time and pains to point it out. I do appreciate it.
PS. From a quick glance at your substack I found the subjects you explore to be of interest to me as well, so I am going to subscribe to it now (but will be to read the essays only later as I have quite a few things on my plate right now)
Thank you. I appreciate it and just would like to be clear about what specifically are you referring to. I wrote several comments and replies so which comment are you referring to (you wrote "your first post above", you mean the one with the question for Charles?) and what SPECIFICALLY in the comment are you referring to? So that I may better umderstand what you are saying. Thank you
My guess, based on what I've been reading here ... With "your first post above", Josh is referring to your comment to Leonara ... which starts with, "Leonara, two things. First regarding the content and second regarding the energy of your reply ...". I would guess Jowzer is also referring to that. It was rather long, at ~1600 words it basically a short essay. It was, from my point of view, also very inflammatory, and contained a significant amount of projection, evident (to me) in exactly what Josh has pointed out (e.g. "You are blaming another commentator for being "immature", "mocking", and "attacking", yet I don't think that you realize that you are doing much of the same yourself".)
It seems apparent to me you feel very strongly about the topic(s) at hand, and your behaviour comes across as highly reactionary and aggressive. I get the sense that underneath it all, you don't wish to come across as either of those things. But I don't wish to make assumptions about you.
Thank you. I understand what you are saying and will indeed take it to heart. Thank you for taking the time and pains to point it out. I do appreciate it.
PS. From a quick glance at your substack I found the subjects you explore to be of interest to me as well, so I am going to subscribe to it now (but will be to read the essays only later as I have quite a few things on my plate right now)