I agree. Responsibility entails accountability. One of the problems in our time is that no politician in power is held accountable for his wrong-doings. On the long run it destroys a society, which can be witnessed in many western democracies.
Are accountability and punishment the same? In my mind I view punishment at hurting someone or making them suffer because their actions hurt me or caused me to suffer. But nothing is truly gained from it - just "an eye for an eye". Accountability would be for someone to own their wrongdoing (unlikely, in this case) and make steps to repair the damage as best as can be done as, in this case, it can't truly be undone.
If we do not punish those who have done "wrong" Charles . . . does that not invite others to also do wrong, without the risk of accountability?
I agree. Responsibility entails accountability. One of the problems in our time is that no politician in power is held accountable for his wrong-doings. On the long run it destroys a society, which can be witnessed in many western democracies.
There must be consequences for our actions. We teach our children this. Why should they get away with it?
Are accountability and punishment the same? In my mind I view punishment at hurting someone or making them suffer because their actions hurt me or caused me to suffer. But nothing is truly gained from it - just "an eye for an eye". Accountability would be for someone to own their wrongdoing (unlikely, in this case) and make steps to repair the damage as best as can be done as, in this case, it can't truly be undone.
The concept of restitution strikes me as applicable. Making it right again, or as close to right as possible.
Feudalism is the way to go!
The ruler serves the ruled.
The ruler has total accountability and the power to match. Misuse = off with his head.
The ruled have little accountability because they rule over none but also the power to match - almost none.
Ruler with a standing army makes this dynamic tricky.